It conclusion relates to both fricative /?/ plus the affricate (/?/: NV 2,960 Hz vs
Figure 8. reveals the outcome with the very first and you will 2nd formant on stop of one’s vowel before /?/ and also in the standard Gloss and the fresh new variations.
In terms of the brand new frequency from F1 of your before vowel is concerned, the results point out a lower F1 on the variant away from compared to its Important Polish related voice (NV 594 Hz against. SP 665 Hz, t=?2.730, p : t=?dos.204, p
The outcome plus revealed that the fresh new F3 frequency of one’s following vowel was rather highest from the brand new variants when compared with the standard Shine versions. SP 2,831 Hz, t=dos.763, p : NV 2,939 Hz compared to. SP 2,810 Hz, t=dos.567, p . 325, p is significantly various other on Simple Polish and you will brand new variations; F1 volume diversity is actually lower austrian women for white men dating site in the brand new variation (/?/: NV ?87 Hz against. SP ?33 Hz, t=?dos.086, p : NV ?121 Hz versus. ?67 Hz, t=?dos.086, p=.055 (in the quantity of analytical tendency)). No factor among them versions are discovered with the F2 and you can F3 volume list of the latest preceding vowel. Similarly, this new F1, F2 and you will F3 volume range of your adopting the vowel just weren’t somewhat other when you look at the Important Gloss and the the variant.
No high distinctions were found in the duration of frication from the fricative and the affricate: when you find yourself Important Polish /?/ keeps an average duration of 0.098 s, the typical value of the fresh new variant is actually 0.101 s. This new fricative the main affricate try 0.061 s inside the Basic Shine and you can 0.058 s from the the version.
In all this new analyses presented above the determine off Address Layout and you will Stress try tall only in a number of designs. The outcomes out-of address build are consistent to some extent with the analysis of Maniwa et al. (2009), and this indicated that English fricatives showcase some other acoustic characteristics when you look at the a good conversational compared to. an obvious design. REPETITION try more often high, albeit exclusively, when you look at the formants and you may period, and a lot more frequently in the affricates than in fricatives; see the result of the fresh new statistical analyses into the Appendix C.
step three.step 1. Linear discriminant data
The analysis showed more than factors to significant differences in numerous parameters within the fresh and you will Standard Gloss sibilant. The goal of the next linear discriminant research (LDA) they to show hence of your own investigated parameters are the most helpful in discriminating brand new version on Simple Shine version and exactly what part of the data are going to be correctly categorized by with this particular statistical approach. I used the LDA with jacknifed (we.e., get-off you to definitely out) predictions. This new LDA was previously properly utilized for this new discrimination from English fricatives (Jongman mais aussi al. 2000; McMurray and you will Jongman 2011). According to the study demonstrated above, we’re going to keep fricatives and you may affricates when you look at the separate communities.
When it comes to brand new determine from REPETITION are significantly other on the Important Shine and you can new version (t = ?dos
Every acoustic parameters presented inside (4) was indeed integrated due to the fact predictors from the LDA whatever the fact one to a few of them just weren’t significant regarding linear regression patterns. The LDA outputs just one function you to definitely most useful discriminates one another variants away from fricatives (Important Shine against. the latest version). Due to the fact spectral peak and you will COG highly coordinated with each other (0.79), the previous was also excluded about design. In total, 19 predictors installing the LDA, 9 of which didn’t somewhat join the latest discrimination of the quality Polish as opposed to the newest version. Which, the rest variables (10) have been fitting to the last design. The latest design is extremely tall (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.5251, ?2 = , df = 10, p in the place of the involved brand new variations.
Leave A Comment